top of page
ORCID_iD.svg.png

Premium

Tphysicsletters/6981/11/1490/77009901.568tpl/Detection of the large-scale tidal field with galaxy multiplet alignment in the DESI Y1 spectroscopic survey

Theoretical Physics Letters.png

Wednesday, August 21, 2024 at 10:15:00 AM UTC

Article Rating by Publisher
10
T. Physics
Article Rating by Readers
10
Premium

Detection of the large-scale tidal field with galaxy multiplet alignment in the DESI Y1 spectroscopic survey

Claire Lamman , 1★ Daniel Eisenstein,1 Jaime E. Forero-Romero , 2,3 Jessica Nicole Aguilar,4 Steven Ahlen , 5 Stephen Bailey , 4 Davide Bianchi , 6 David Brooks,7 Todd Claybaugh,4 Axel de la Macorra , 8 Peter Doel,7 Simone Ferraro , 4,9 Andreu Font-Ribera , 7,10 Enrique Gaztañaga,11,12,13 Satya Gontcho A Gontcho , 4 Gaston Gutierrez,14 Klaus Honscheid,15,16,17 Cullan Howlett , 18 Anthony Kremin , 4 Andrew Lambert,4 Martin Landriau , 4 Laurent Le Guillou , 19 Michael E. Levi , 4 Aaron Meisner , 20 Ramon Miquel,21,10 John Moustakas , 22 Jeffrey A. Newman , 23 Gustavo Niz , 24,25 Francisco Prada , 26 Ignasi Pérez-Ràfols , 27 Ashley J. Ross , 15,28,17 Graziano Rossi,29 Eusebio Sanchez , 30 Michael Schubnell,31,32 David Sprayberry,20 Gregory Tarlé , 32 Mariana Vargas-Magaña , 8 Benjamin Alan Weaver,20 Hu Zou 33

Theoretical Physics Letters

2024 ° 22(08) ° 11-11

https://www.wikipt.org/tphysicsletters

DOI: 10.1490/77009901.568tpl

Acknowledgment
The authors wish to acknowledge useful conversations with Jonathan Blazek, Elisa Chisari, Thomas Bakx, and Christos Georgiou at the LILAC workshop, hosted at the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian. They also thank the DESI internal reviewers, Carolina Cuesta-Lazaro and Jiamin Hou for feedback on the paper. This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under grant DE-SC0013718, NASA under ROSES grant 12-EUCLID12-0004, and the Simons Foundation.

Unlock Only

Changeover the Schrödinger Equation

This option will drive you towards only the selected publication. If you want to save money then choose the full access plan from the right side.

Unlock all

Get access to entire database

This option will unlock the entire database of us to you without any limitations for a specific time period.
This offer is limited to 100000 clients if you make delay further, the offer slots will be booked soon. Afterwards, the prices will be 50% hiked.

Newsletters
Abstract
We explore correlations between the orientations of small galaxy groups, or “multiplets”, and the large-scale gravitational tidal field. Using data from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Y1 survey, we detect the intrinsic alignment (IA) of multiplets to the galaxy-traced matter field out to separations of 100ℎ −1Mpc. Unlike traditional IA measurements of individual galaxies, this estimator is not limited by imaging of galaxy shapes and allows for direct IA detection beyond redshift 𝑧 = 1. Multiplet alignment is a form of higher-order clustering, for which the scale-dependence traces the underlying tidal field and amplitude is a result of small-scale (< 1ℎ −1Mpc) dynamics. Within samples of bright galaxies (BGS), luminous red galaxies (LRG) and emission-line galaxies (ELG), we find similar scale-dependence regardless of intrinsic luminosity or colour. This is promising for measuring tidal alignment in galaxy samples that typically display no intrinsic alignment. DESI’s LRG mock galaxy catalogues created from the AbacusSummit N-body simulations produce a similar alignment signal, though with a 33% lower amplitude at all scales. An analytic model using a non-linear power spectrum (NLA) only matches the signal down to 20ℎ −1Mpc. Our detection demonstrates that galaxy clustering in the non-linear regime of structure formation preserves an interpretable memory of the large-scale tidal field. Multiplet alignment complements traditional two-point measurements by retaining directional information imprinted by tidal forces, and contains additional line-of-sight information compared to weak lensing. This is a more effective estimator than the alignment of individual galaxies in dense, blue, or faint galaxy samples.

Read more articles




 



 



Introduction
Galaxies form and reside within a large-scale structure primarily composed of dark matter. This spatial clustering is shaped by gravitational forces acting on initially small perturbations present in the very early universe. As structure grows hierarchically through gravitational instability, the tidal fields associated with the evolving matter density are expected to induce subtle effects on the shapes, spins, and orientations of galaxies and dark matter haloes. These correlations are broadly known as "Intrinsic Alignments" (IA). Generally, elliptical galaxies and haloes display a linear relationship with the large-scale tidal field, where long axes are aligned with its stretching direction. For a pedagogical introduction to IA, see Lamman et al. (2023a) and for comprehensive reviews, see Joachimi et al. (2015) and Troxel & Ishak (2015). IA are most commonly studied as a contaminant of cosmological probes, such as weak lensing and redshift-space distortions (RSD), but in principle they can also be used to trace any cosmological effect which is imprinted in the large-scale density field (Chisari & Dvorkin 2013). Compared to traditional two-point clustering statistics, IA have the advantage of capturing both the magnitude and polarization of tidal shear, as is done with weak lensing. While weak lensing traces all foreground matter, IA from spectroscopic data contain additional information along the line-of-sight. However, the effect is subtle and requires large samples and high-quality imaging. IA have been explored as a probe of primordial non-gaussianity (Akitsu et al. 2021; Kurita & Takada 2023), Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (Okumura et al. 2019; Xu et al. 2023), Redshift-space Distortions (Okumura & Taruya 2023), and cosmic B-modes (Georgiou et al. 2023; Akitsu et al. 2023; Saga et al. 2024). In some cases it is advantageous to study the alignment of galaxy ensembles: groups and clusters as opposed to individuals. The determined shapes of galaxy ensembles are unaffected by the myriad of systematic effects which arise from imaging, and are associated with the shape of their host haloes, which display stronger tidal alignment (Smargon et al. 2012; Fortuna et al. 2021; Lee et al. 2023). Clusters of Luminous Red Galaxies (LRGs) in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey display similar but stronger alignment compared to single galaxies (Smargon et al. 2012; van Uitert & Joachimi 2017). These correlations were found to be lower than predicted by N-body simulations, which may be due to hydrodynamic or projection effects, which create misidentification of cluster members (Shi et al. 2024). There are also concerns of orientation bias in identifying clusters, particularly for photometric surveys (Sunayama 2023).In this work we explore the potential of using galaxy “multiplets”: small sets of galaxies, mostly consisting of 2-4 members within 1 ℎ −1Mpc of each other (Fig. 1). We expect these tiny ensembles to still preserve information from the large-scale tidal field, while being more abundant than larger groups. Multiplets are not necessarily virialized systems, but can be understood in the IA framework as they are well within the nonlinear regime of gravitational evolution. Like galaxy shapes and haloes, their orbital structure carries a memory of the initial tidal field. The alignment of galaxy multiplets may be a better estimator than individual galaxies when: imaging is poor, the sample is especially dense, or the sample displays little or no individual alignment, as is the case for spiral (or “blue”) galaxies. The latter of these applies to most available spectroscopic samples beyond redshift 1. Understanding the redshift evolution of IA is an important component of fully utilising forthcoming cosmic shear surveys (Dark Energy Survey and Kilo-Degree Survey Collaboration et al. 2023). However the redshift evolution of IA is unclear and there is no direct IA detection beyond redshift 1 with traditional estimators.We describe and model this estimator from the perspective of IA, but this work is also related to the fields of both galaxy groups and higher-order clustering. Although multiplets are not galaxy groups, which are virialized systems and typically describe more complete sets of galaxies (Oppenheimer et al. 2021), multiplets exist on similar scales. They can overlap group catalogues, especially when multiplets are identified in dense samples. Furthermore, the nonlinear dynamics within groups directly affect the amplitude of multiplet alignment. Since, in most cases, we are measuring the orientation of close galaxy pairs relative to a distant tracer, this estimator can also be thought of as a squeezed three-point correlation function. Previous work has explored 3-point and higher-order correlations in spectroscopic data (Slepian & Eisenstein 2015; Philcox et al. 2022), including detecting evidence of the tidal field (Slepian et al. 2017) and investigating the squeezed 3-point function (Yuan et al. 2017). These describe correlations that arise from larger scales than multiplets, but are a similar framing of our estimator. As a spectroscopic survey of over 40 million galaxies, the DESI Survey (Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument), is well-suited to probing subtle, higher-order clustering effects in three dimensions (Levi et al. 2013; DESI Collaboration et al. 2016a,b, 2022, 2023a; Miller et al. 2023). To explore the potential of multiplet IA, we measure the tidal alignment of multiplets in DESI’s Year 1 survey (DESI Collaboration et al. 2024a,b,c). We use three galaxy samples: bright galaxies (BGS), luminous red galaxies (LRG), and emissionline galaxies (ELG), ranging from redshifts 0.1 – 1.5. As a proofof-concept for interpreting this estimator, we develop modelling for the catalogue which displays the highest galaxy bias and alignment signal, LRGs. Section 2 describes the DESI data and mock catalogues used. Section 3 outlines our methodology for identifying galaxy multiplets and measuring their alignment. Section 4 presents a comparison to mock catalogues and an analytic model of the alignment signal. Section 5 summarizes key results and discusses prospects for utilising future datasets. Throughout the paper we assume the cosmological parameters of 𝐻0 = 69.6, Ω𝑚,0 = 0.286, ΩΛ,0 = 0.714.
Read more articles


 



 


Conclusion
In this work we explore the potential of multiplet alignment for large spectroscopic surveys through DESI’s Year 1 data. These multiplets mostly consist of 2-4 members within 1ℎ −1Mpc of each other. By measuring their orientations relative to the galaxy-traced tidal field, we detect an intrinsic alignment signal out to projected separations of 100 ℎ −1Mpc and beyond redshift 1. Advantages of this galaxy multiplet alignment over the alignment of individual galaxies depend on properties of the galaxy catalogue, including morphology, density, and imaging quality. We find similar signals regardless of galaxy colour or luminosity, which is a promising result for measuring the tidal field with galaxy populations that typically display little or no intrinsic shape alignment.
Using the LRG sample as a case study, we reproduce the LRG measurement with mock catalogues from the AbacusSummit Nbody simulations, finding they under-predict the signal amplitude but match its shape. Using a nonlinear tidal alignment model, we find an amplitude parameter 𝜏 = −0.106 ± 0.002, which characterizes the response of multiplet orientations to the tidal field. This modelling matches the measured signal above scales of 20ℎ −1Mpc but fails to capture nonlinear effects at smaller scales, unlike the N-body prediction.
The multiplet alignment signal could be improved by supplementing multiplet catalogues with imaging, by identifying additional galaxies close to spectroscopic targets. Additional improvements could be made by weighting the shapes of multiplets based on member luminosity, or weighting the alignment by multiplet richness. Although we focus on modelling LRGs for this estimator, they are not necessarily the most optimal application. The signal is especially clear for the dense BGS region and warrants further exploration into sub-trends within the population, such as redshift and luminosity dependence.



References
A. Ross et al. 2024, in preparation Akitsu K., Kurita T., Nishimichi T., Takada M., Tanaka S., 2021, Physical Review D, 103, 083508 Akitsu K., Li Y., Okumura T., 2023, Physical Review D, 107, 063531 Blazek J., Vlah Z., Seljak U., 2015, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2015, 015 Bridle S., King L., 2007, New Journal of Physics, 9, 444 Brown M. L., Taylor A. N., Hambly N. C., Dye S., 2002, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 333, 501 Catelan P., Porciani C., 2001, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 323, 713 Chisari N. E., Dvorkin C., 2013, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 12, 029 DESI Collaboration 2024, in preparation DESI Collaboration 2025, in preparation DESI Collaboration et al., 2016b, The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design, doi:10.48550/arXiv.1611.00036, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016arXiv161100036D DESI Collaboration et al., 2016a, The DESI Experiment Part II: Instrument Design, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/ 2016arXiv161100037D DESI Collaboration et al., 2022, The Astronomical Journal, 164, 207 DESI Collaboration et al., 2023a, The Early Data Release of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2306.06308, https: //ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230606308D DESI Collaboration et al., 2023b, Validation of the Scientific Program for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2306.06307, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230606307D DESI Collaboration et al., 2024a, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2404.03000 DESI Collaboration et al., 2024b, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2404.03001 DESI Collaboration et al., 2024c, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2404.03002 Dark Energy Survey and Kilo-Degree Survey Collaboration et al., 2023, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 6, 36 Davis M., Efstathiou G., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., 1985, The Astrophysical Journal, 292, 371 Dey A., et al., 2019, The Astronomical Journal, 157, 168 Eke V. R., et al., 2004, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 348, 866 Fortuna M. C., Hoekstra H., Joachimi B., Johnston H., Chisari N. E., Georgiou C., Mahony C., 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 501, 2983 Galler B. A., Fisher M. J., 1964, Commun. ACM, 7, 301 Georgiou C., et al., 2019, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 622, A90 Georgiou C., Bakx T., van Donkersgoed J., Chisari N. E., 2023, B-modes from galaxy cluster alignments in future surveys, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2309.03841, https://ui.adsabs.harvard. edu/abs/2023arXiv230903841G Guy J., et al., 2023, The Astronomical Journal, 165, 144 Hadzhiyska B., Eisenstein D., Bose S., Garrison L. H., Maksimova N., 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 509, 501 Hahn C., et al., 2023, The Astronomical Journal, 165, 253 Hirata C. M., Seljak U., 2004, Physical Review D, 70, 063526 Hirata C. M., Mandelbaum R., Ishak M., Seljak U., Nichol R., Pimbblet K. A., Ross N. P., Wake D., 2007, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 381, 1197 Joachimi B., et al., 2015, Space Science Reviews, 193, 1 Krolewski A., et al., 2024, Impact and mitigation of spectroscopic systematics on DESI DR1 clustering measurements, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2405.17208, https://ui.adsabs.harvard. edu/abs/2024arXiv240517208K Kurita T., Takada M., 2023, Physical Review D, 108, 083533 Lamman C., Tsaprazi E., Shi J., Niko Šarčević N., Pyne S., Legnani E., Ferreira T., 2023a, The IA Guide: A Breakdown of Intrinsic Alignment Formalisms, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2309.08605, https://ui. adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230908605L Lamman C., et al., 2023b, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 522, 117 Lamman C., et al., 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 528, 6559 Lasker J., et al., 2024, Production of Alternate Realizations of DESI Fiber Assignment for Unbiased Clustering Measurement in Data and Simulations, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2404.03006, https://ui.adsabs. harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240403006L Lee J., Ryu S., Baldi M., 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 945, 15 Levi M., et al., 2013, The DESI Experiment, a whitepaper for Snowmass 2013, doi:10.48550/arXiv.1308.0847, https://ui.adsabs.harvard. edu/abs/2013arXiv1308.0847L Maksimova N. A., Garrison L. H., Eisenstein D. J., Hadzhiyska B., Bose S., Satterthwaite T. P., 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 508, 4017 Mena-Fernández J., et al., 2024, HOD-Dependent Systematics for Luminous Red Galaxies in the DESI 2024 BAO Analysis, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2404.03008, https://ui.adsabs.harvard. edu/abs/2024arXiv240403008M Miller T. N., et al., 2023, The Optical Corrector for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2306.06310, https:// ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230606310M

Abstract
Introduction
Conclusion
References

All Products

bottom of page